The Photo-Kino Department

The government turns to private citizens
1921

As the Belarusian government settled in, it created its own People’s Commissariat of Education, or Narkompros, which had a Glavpolitprosvet (Main Administration for Political Education), which had a Photo-Kino Department that handled film.1 Moise Dinershtein, who had been head of the Rabis (The Art Union), was named the Deputy Head of the Department.2

The new Photo-Kino Department realized it needed experienced people to help get films and help the movie theaters run. Two of the first that the Department turned to were Shlomo Schnittman, who once ran the Eden theater in Minsk (later the International) and Abram Lifshitz, who had run the Giant (later the Red Star). Lifshitz was named head of the Photo-Kino Department. Schnittman was still a private citizen, although he was given the title of “Commissioner of the Glavpolitprovset” (The Main Department for Political Education). Both men appeared to be oborotistyy, “wheeler-dealers” with a long history in the cinema. They turned out to be aferistyy, con men.

Photograph of Schlomo Schnittman

Shlomo Schnittman.
Source: National Archives of Belarus (NARB).

Photograph of Abram Lifshitz

Abram Lifshitz.
Source: National Archives of Belarus (NARB).

The two men were investigated in the waning months of 1921 after testimony from Victor Nesterovich, who was the Deputy Head of the Photo-Kino Department. The most damning sentence in the investigative report is:

Comrade Livshits, head of the Photo-Cinema Department, looked upon his Soviet work as an object of personal gain, not at all interested in the tasks that Soviet cinema was supposed to serve.

Conclusion of Report NARB_LA_101_1_330_23-23b

A report from April 1921 contains a list of films owned by the Photo-Kino Department.

  1. "Savva" by Leonid Andreev, drama in 6 parts
  2. "Love and Friendship", drama in 6 parts
  3. "Juvenile Delinquency", scientific in 3 parts
  4. "History of the Italian Revolution" in part 1
  5. "The Hair is Long, but the Mind is Short", comedy in 3 parts
  6. "Construction of Bridges", scientific in part 1
  7. "Kalmar Town", view in part 1
  8. "False Coupon" by Tolstoy, drama in 4 parts
  9. "Arise, Rise, Working People", agitational drama in 4 parts
  10. "As It Was, But It Won't Be" by Lunacharsky, drama in 5 parts
  11. "The Darkness of Life" (Deceived) by Tolstoy in 5 parts
  12. "The Tale of the Fisherman and the Fish", children's program in 2 parts
  13. "Caucasus", a geographical essay in 3 parts
  14. "Beekeeping", scientific in 2 parts3

We know that the 1913 film False Coupon was shown in Grodno (Click here to see where we reported on that)

Image of Poster of As it Was, But Not As It Will Be

As It Was, But Not As It Will Be, poster.
Source: https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/731046/

Text poster of As It Was, But Not As It Will Be

As It Was, But Not As It Will Be poster.
Source: https://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/movie/empire/14469/annot/

In mid-1921, the Photo-Kino Department sent Israel Schnittman, Sholmo’s son, to Petrograd to obtain a film about the Kronstadt Uprising of March 1921, which was put down by Leon Trotsky.

Kronstadt Uprising, March 1921.
Source: Seventeen Moments in Soviet History. https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1921/kronstadt-uprising/kronstadt-uprising-video/

The younger Schnittman was also entrusted to obtain the films Proletariat4, and Hunger in the Volga Region5, which was shown at the Red Star (see that information here)

In the summer of 1921, Lifshitz masterminded a complicated scheme that netted him and the senior Schnittman a great deal of money. In July, Lifshitz concluded a contract with someone named Yelin for delivery of films. Yelin got half of the total profits of the Minsk cinema theaters, and Lifshitz kept another 25%. (The report does not say where the rest of the money went, presumably to the Photo-Kino Department). Lifshitz claimed the money he took was to support employees, but he paid money to both the former director of Red Star theater (Aron Leibovich) and to the new director, Aron Javits.6

Sometime in all of this, Lifshitz worked out a deal with Schnittman. Lifshitz offered Schnittman and a man named Belenky a chance to “rent the cinema” (unnamed in the conclusion of the Photo Kino investigation report but presumably the Red Star) because, and quoting Lifshitz, "the new economic policy allows renting without employees." That deal never came off, and Lifshitz and Yelin continued to work together, but Schnittman still benefited by receiving one-third of total proceeds. (The exact split is unclear.)7

In the conclusion, Nesterovich, the Deputy Head of the GPP, was cleared and cited as a “’pawn’ in the hands of the experienced and daring businessmen Livshits and Shnittman.”8

Lifshitz and Schnittman were arrested by the Cheka (Soviet secret police) in January of 1922,9 Javits was dismissed from his post as head of the Red Star on January 3. At that time, M. Belkind was named as head of the Photo-Kino Department.10 Schnittman’s son, Israel, who had been running the Culture theater (the former Modern)11 was also arrested, although the exact charges are unclear.12


1 Akt [«Акт»; Act], 31 May 1921. Natsional'nyi arkhiv Respubliki Belarus [Нацыянальны архіў Рэспублікі Беларусь; National Archives of Belarus] (NARB), fond 101, inv. 1, file 639, doc. 202–204. This document describes Photo-Kino as a subdivision of the Art Department.

2 Vypiska iz prikaza No. 76 [«Выписка из приказа за № 76»; Excerpt from Order No. 76], 15 Jul. 1921. NARB, fond 42, inv. 1, file 1052, doc. 25, sec. 56.

3 Sobstvennye kartiny Tsentral'nogo Sklada Belorussii, zakuplennykh Foto-Kino podotdelom [«Собственные картины Центрального Склада Белоруссии, закупленных Фото-Кино под-отделом»; Films from the Central Warehouse of Belarus Purchased by the Photo-Cinema Subdepartment], 17 Apr. 1921. NARB, fond 101, inv. 1, file 639, doc. 139.

4 Proletariat na strazhe Revoliutsii [«Пролетариат на страже Революции»; The Proletariat Stands Guard over the Revolution] https://www.kino-teatr.ru/short/movie/sov/89750/annot/ Accessed 16 Dec. 2025.

5 Mandat [«Мандат»; Mandate], 22 Oct. 1921. NARB, fond 42, inv. 3, file 2634, doc. 5. The document bears a handwritten date of 22 Oct. 1921, likely added when it was entered as evidence in the case against Schnittman; the document itself contains no typed date.

6 Zakliuchenie otcheta [«Заключение отчета»; Conclusion of a Report], 21 Nov. 1921. NARB, fond 101, inv. 1, file 330, doc. 23–23b.

7 Zakliuchenie otcheta.

8 Zakliuchenie otcheta.

9 Prikaz No. 2 po Glavpolitprosvetu SSR Belorussii [«Приказ № 2 по Главполитпросвету С.С.Р. Белоруссии»; Order No. 2 of the Main Political Education Department of the SSR of Belarus], 2 Jan. 1922. NARB, fond 101, inv. 1, file 640, doc. 40.

10 Prikaz No. 2 po Glavpolitprosvetu SSR Belorussii.

11 Prikaz No. 161 [«Приказ № 161»; Order No. 161], 29 Nov. 1921. NARB, fond 101, inv. 1, file 196, doc. 125b.

12 Prikaz No. 3 po Glavpolitprosvetu SSR Belorussii [«Приказ № 3 по Главполитпросвету ССР Белоруссии»; Order No. 3 of the Main Political Education Department of the SSR of Belarus], 3 Jan. 1922. NARB, fond 101, inv. 1, file 640, doc. 40b.

Previous
Previous

Changes to the Belarusian Government and the Arts

Next
Next

Cost Accounting and Private Film Dealers